It's not publishing the info. It's fine. The point is to stifle mass media.
Tom Morton On 20 May 2011, at 23:28, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 May 2011 23:13, Thomas Morton <morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Ah. No thats not accurate. Fortunately even the British courts can't >> stamp On private communication. >> >> The injunction is on publishing the info. Telling your mates down the >> pub is fine. >> > > No it isn't. Telling one mate down the pub might but multiple people > is kinda dicey. I assume more than one person has access to the > User:Oversight feed. > > Exactly what is and isn't considered a private communication is a > complex area though. > > > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
