On 26 April 2011 20:22, MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > It appears that nobody appears to actually follow this rule (including the > "New York Times"), but I find the nuance interesting. I imagine one would > perform better than the other during fundraising; perhaps there's hard data > on that.
This varies between local dialects of English. The word "charity" is much more freely applied to anything tax-deductible in the UK than it is in Australia or (as far as I can tell) the US, for example. I wouldn't sweat it hugely. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
