On 26 April 2011 03:06, <[email protected]> wrote: > I always thought that translations were considered "wholely derivative", > that is that a new copyright is *not* created, by translating.
I would expect that to vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, jurisdictions that includes some kind of "sweat of the brow" doctrine would probably protect translations. What jurisdiction are you referring to? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
