Validly licenced images of this building and thousands of others are routinely deleted due to Wikimedia Commons' 'FoP' policy. Clearly this damages our educational mission and impacts many projects. One proposed remedy is a tweak to the policy on the lines of that arising from the National Portrait Gallery dispute. Opponents of change say things like "Commons only accepts free content" which was never strictly true even before the NPG/PD-art policy change.
The question which I'd like to hear your views on is: Can you think of any valid arguments to the effect that deleting these images has an upside - a benefit to our mission? P Carney _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
