On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Birgitte SB <[email protected]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Ray Saintonge <[email protected]> >> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sun, March 6, 2011 3:54:11 AM >> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] 2006-2011: Mexican, Argentinian, Brazilian >>governments distance themselves from freedomdefined 1.0 >> >> On 03/05/11 8:04 PM, Newyorkbrad wrote: >> > I'll ask the same thing here that I asked in the other thread and no one >> > responded to, which is, can someone please provide some concrete examples > of >> > how this issue affects Wikipedia, rather than discuss the disagreement in >> > purely abstract and theoretical terms? Frankly, I have very little idea >> > what the post below means, which is something I'd like to change as it >> > sounds somewhat important. >> >> Of these three I would find the Mexican situation to be of greatest >> concern. Mexico already has extraordinarily long copyright terms. It's >> in the ND feature that the potential moral rights problems lie. When is >> a derivative sufficiently different to be defamatory. What is the >> thinking behind adding the ND parameter. Is it some vain attempt to >> ensure accuracy, or is there a more insidious reasoning. > > ND also rules out translations
(I always thought this was a weakness of the original ND idea. There were a few long debates within CC about whether to enable translation, or to have a separate translation-specific flag, which faded out.) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
