On 17 February 2011 18:49, whothis <whoth...@gmail.com> wrote: > All that seems rather useless for the most part, I doubt anything from an > RfA or the AN/I has been brought up this list.
WT:RFA tends to be pretty wide ranging and WP:AN/I is one of the places major flareups can begin (although I would generally suggest that tracking WP:AN is more efficient) >This list seems to be mostly > policy related discussions, and its probably much easier to follow than what > you listed above. WP:AN/I is however very much on the coalface of en.wikipedia. If you want to know what problems are cropping on a day to basis that is the kind of thing you need to pay attention to rather than the rather more abstracted mailing lists. > Again, if you were to ask a community member about half > the stuff you follow, they would have told you that 90% of it is rather > useless and trivial. Thats true of pretty much everything though. > There are other policy related things which seem to be > going by without notice. With the number of policies listed at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies The weakings who sleep or do silly things like actually edit the article pages are going to miss stuff. Sure this will sometimes result in you staring blearily at a deletion log wondering why CSD#T2 has come back to life (answer it means something different now) but that is pretty unavoidable. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
