Hoi,
Eh? When Wikipedia is to comply with this, technically it will be in
MediaWiki where such compliance is realised. Also MediaWiki is a Wikimedia
Foundation project in its own right.
Many people who read this list, including me, find this a subject that is
absolutely on topic. Even stronger, I would like us to test our compliance
because it will tell us what we can do to do better. When we say that we
want to bring information to all people, we do not mean impaired people are
excluded.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 16 February 2011 23:44, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Christine Moellenberndt
> <cmoellenber...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > The answer is, to the best of our knowledge, no. But we'd like to
> > improve that.
> >
> > i took it off-list as it seemed to be a question that was more
> > Media-Wiki centered, and not as much Foundation centered.
> >
> >
> > -Christine
> >
> > ---------
> > Christine Moellenberndt
> > Community Associate
> > Wikimedia Foundation
> >
>
> Hmm.. strikes me odd and worries me than Community Associate doesn't
> seem to differentiate between software "Media-Wiki" (sic), and
> Foundation/Community issues (Wikimedia).
>
> Opening post was about if Wikimedia (as organization) complies with
> regulations I don't see what software has to do with it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
