2011/2/16 John Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > <nemow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This re-licensing seems even more legally complex than ours (although >> uncontroversial). > > How can they relicense without explicit permission from each > contributor, or an update clause in the licence? >
Well - if their terms of use said that the all contributors transfer the copyrights to Canonical Ltd. - the company can licence such the content as it wishes and in fact E-mails send to their contributors is just a matter of their goodwill to be moral toward them. -- Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/ http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
