Mind you, the problems remain,... I don't know, I'm flying to America tomorrow, and have been running around for weeks trying to get stuff done, while the UK was under the grip of the worst weather in 50 years.
I think that Citizendium is a toxic asset, and Wikipedia almost certainly shouldn't step in. It'd be almost on the level of "Wikipedia! Now with added Conservapedia!" On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Adam Cuerden <cuer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, why not just offer Citizendium space on Wikia? Could that be done? > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Adam Cuerden <cuer...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd seriously advocate against this. Citizendium is well known to have >> major, major problems. You may have heard about the Homeopathy >> situation, where not only was a dangerous article - it suggested >> homeopathy be used to treat life-threatening conditions - written by >> homeopaths, with nary a word of criticism that wasn't immediately >> "rebutted", put on the main page, but Larry Sanger ran around >> advocating for it. >> >> If you want to set up a service for small wiki hosting, it may not be >> a bad idea, but I wouldn't under any circumstances do it just for >> Citizendium. >> > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
