John Vandenberg, 21/10/2010 12:30: > If history is anything to go by, a single issue candidate is the best > chance that WMF will adjust its strategy to devote more energy towards > supporting the sister projects.
Have we ever had a single-issue trustee who achieved something? > I'd hoped that the strategy project would result in board adoption of > proposals that focus on the sister projects. Despite the five year > plan not speaking directly about growing the sister projects and small > language projects, I'm hoping the board recognises that their > ambitious targets will only be realised if they embrace the untapped > opportunity for growth in the sister projects. If this doesn't > eventuate, I think we'll need to consider giving sister projects some > form of direct representation on the board. Maybe I was dreaming, but > I vaguely recall someone suggesting this on foundation-l. It may be something to consider, but I think that it's easier so support and participate in chapters. Chapters are currently the only Wikimedia organizations who care about sisterprojects and do something for them (especially biggest/oldest ones; I would mention WM-DE, WMFr, WMI), and most likely the only chance for the Wikimedia movement to do something for sisterproject within a/the strategic plan. Chapters members (and trustees) are often cross-project- and meta-contributors, and viceversa; and people involved in chapters usually have a broader view of the Wikimedia movement, i.e. they don't think only about Wikipedia, so they're more interested in sisteprojects. I think that Arne and Phoebe are good examples of this, and therefore good WMF trustees for sisterprojects (as well as at least one community elected WMF trustee, by the way). Nemo -- Federico Leva [[Meta:User:Nemo_bis]] (See for contact methods. This account is for lists only.) _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
