A short piece here http://ocham.blogspot.com/2010/10/andronicus-of-rhodes.html You can read it, but the take-home is pretty brief.
(1) Here is another of the many examples where proper encyclopedic content is plagiarised entirely from 100-year old sources. (2) Suggesting the thought: if Wikipedia now is relying on century-old sources, what sources will Wikipedia be relying on in 100 years time? For Wikipedia has apparently made traditional sources obselete. Peter :-( _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
