On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:14 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That there is ambiguity at the edges does not disprove NPOV. Day fades > into night, but they're different things. This template is blatant > advocacy to violate NPOV, and indeed to do so across all Wikimedia > sites. They had it up on the main page, too. So? Apparently the fact that there exists some template that is not NPOV means that we should be forcing our morals on others and not give them any leniency? > It's reasonably clear that there is a deep and serious discussion very > much needed regarding neutral point of view on ace:wp. And because there is a problem with neutral point of view somewhere we should forbid everyone to make a choice for their own? -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
