On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Mark Williamson <node...@gmail.com> wrote: > Amir, > > I think this is a good idea. For the sake of consistency, we should > choose a single standard to follow rather than a hodge-podge of newer > standards, older (although still valid) standards, and ad hoc codes we > made up on the spot (als, nrm) and custom codes (bat-smg, roa-tara, > roa-rup, fiu-vro, map-bms, be-x-old). It also seems potentially > confusing to me that we have codes that overlap, for example na.wp and > nap.wp, ro.wp and roa-rup.wp, etc. > > -m. > >
Aside from simplifying the process of selecting new language codes, what value does consistency have in this situation? Nathan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
