David Gerard wrote: > On 26 June 2010 17:33, <wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >> I don't suspect that is correct for one moment, and there is nothing to >> suggest such FUD in their letter. They are talking about THEIR copyright >> and that "these groups simply do not want to pay for the use of *our* >> music". > > > No, what ASCAP means by that is that they want to get a fee when > people distribute CC-licensed music too.
Do ASAC also expect to get a fee when music by people represented by BMI or SESAC gets distributed? I think not. So why would you assume that they expect a fee when any music is distributed by an artist that isn't signed up to them? > > You're bending over backwards to miss the point here. > I think you are letting your prejudices show. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
