On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can argue, and have argued, that participants should know > this already or can easily discover the relevant information with some > digging. But why not spare them the effort? It's fully possible that > the folks most interested in the specific content are no longer paying > close attention, or will be discouraged enough to just give up. Is > posting a link to a useful description of put-up procedures really a > liability for the WMF? >
I see nothing preventing the community from adopting a template including information about put-up procedures. If the community were to do this, it would not create liability for WMF. I believe David Gerard has suggested something similar. > > The idea here is that some communication is not necessarily ideal > communication, and we can acknowledge that an effort was made while > still asking for just a little bit more. > I'm pleased, of course, that a few people do acknowledge that the effort was made. --Mike _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
