On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:50 PM, K. Peachey <p858sn...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> I do to, depending on how they are applied, for example I would much > prefer on a case by case basis compared to everyone, since a few > people are bring active and decent discussion where as some people are > just trolling/omg censorship is bad type stuff. > > -Peachey > The issue hasn't come up yet, but I would approach things on a case-by-case basis - for example, I wouldn't moderate a Wikimedia staff member who posted more than 30 times because they were answering questions from other list members. Also, if someone is moderated for hitting the limit, I would approve posts beyond their initial 30 posts if I think that the post is useful, and adds to the discussion. If anyone has any questions about the post limit, please feel free to talk to either myself or Austin, on-list or privately. -- [[User:Ral315]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
