On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:37:15AM -0400, Casey Brown wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Alec Conroy <alecmcon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that's a little harsh to say that he doesn't have the
> confidence of the community. I think a *better* reason to remove the
> founder status would be so that he's not carrying out actions himself
> (it's all about checks-and-balances). He can participate in
> discussions and make a decision as "godking", but then why does he
> need to carry the decision out himself? With the position of
> "godking", he can just ask a local user or steward to carry out the
> decision instead of doing it himself with a founder flag.
Seconded. That's what I do too! [1]
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
[1] Except for the part about being the Godking. ;-)
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attachment]
gpg (www.gnupg.org) Fingerprint for key FEF9DD72
5ED6 E215 73EE AD84 E03A 01C5 94AC 7B0E FEF9 DD72
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
