On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Michael Snow <wikipe...@verizon.net> wrote: > Having said that, the Wikimedia projects are intended to be educational > in nature, and there is no place in the projects for material that has > no educational or informational value.
I'd like to point out that we already have a project where most information has no educational value. It's called Wikisource and materials there are primarily of artistic value, not educational or information one. Since I basically support the idea that one of Wikimedia Commons aims is to collect as much notable works of art as possible, I view it as a Wikisource for visual arts and music. Should we expect Wikisource to be cleaned up as well? Does Foundation feel need to host such highly disputed works as [1] or [2]? --vvv [1] http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Lady_Chatterley's_Lover [2] http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Fanny_Hill:_Memoirs_of_a_Woman_of_Pleasure _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
