I think the bigger question would be "Why did Open Democracy copy a mediawiki installation and at least some content from Wiktionary, but change the license to CC-BY-NC-ND and not credit Wiktionary on the history page?"
So in fact, I believe copyright IS at issue here. -Dan On Mar 28, 2010, at 6:48 PM, effe iets anders wrote: > I assume you are referring to the term trademarked rather than copyrighted. > I suggest you contact Mike Godwin directly with this kind of questions, he > is handling those. > > With kind regards, > > Lodewijk > > 2010/3/29 Andrew Turvey <andrewrtur...@googlemail.com> > >> Is the term "Wiktionary" copyrighted? I only ask because the OpenDemocracy >> website has recently started a "Dictionary of Ethical Politics >> "wikitionary"" >> >> http://resurgence.opendemocracy.net/index.php/Main_Page >> >> If it is copyrighted, you may want to say something to them, or else it >> will end up like the "hoover" - a generic term usable by anyone. >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
