I wonder which would be harder, trying to start the first new project in years, or trying to get the English Wikipedia to make a significant policy change?
-- Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man) On 2/27/2010 12:40 PM, David Goodman wrote: > WP contains many of the essential elements of an almanac already, and > could very easily cover all the rest-- it doesn't take a new project, just a > relaxation of some of the self-imposed strictures. Relaxing, without > eliminating , NOT NEWS , NOT DIRECTORY, and NOT INDISCRIMINATE . there's > only one point that would need actual removal: NOT INDISCRIMINATE point 3, > Excessive listing of statistics. > > The basic change could be accomplished by doing just that one > deletion--there is not need for another project, or even another space for > data. > > David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Casey Brown <li...@caseybrown.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tyler <programmer...@comcast.net> wrote: >>> I was just wondering, how would you like to start an almanac, guys? That >> would be neat, a wiki almanac. >>> >> >> <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_new_projects> :-) >> >> -- >> Casey Brown >> Cbrown1023 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
