On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We've advertised third party for-profits in the past with prominent > > matched donations notices before (albeit controversially). This isn't > > that different. > > As you say, that one was controversial and this one isn't that > different. Then it should not surprise you that this one is > controversial too, should it? > IIRC, the most "controversial" part about the Virgin Unite campaign was that I made a stub on the organization using a Single Purpose Account, mispelling the name of the organization, and a bunch of people came up with the conspiracy theory that the short mispelled stub was created by the actual organization (and that somehow there was something wrong with that). But I could be misremembering. What was the Virgin Unite ad like? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
