could you perhaps point to that general WMF policy? Or do you mean you would like to see such a policy, but there is none yet?
Lodewijk 2009/12/3 Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Liam Wyatt <liamwy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Although I can understand that there are genuine reasons why the "anti > > organisational account" rule is in place, can I mention that having an > > organisational account is one of the main things that GLAM institutions > have > > asked from us. If a museum wants to upload their own photographs to > Commons > > (something which I think we all would love to support) they have > requested > > that they be able to upload those images under their own organisational > > username. This in itself doesn't necessarily mean we should change our > > policies, but it's just an example of a good outcome that changing our > flat > > ban on organisational accounts would achieve. > > Then they should sign contracts with WMF. OR: They should send their > identification to WMF staff and WMF should make clear that those accounts > are > exceptions from the general policy. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
