On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hoi, > Given that the WSJ is making a lot of noise about moving all its content > behind a paywall and is planning to remove its headlines from the "prying > eyes" of Google, I think it is appropriate to honour their wish and no > longer consider the WSJ as a verifiable source. It is appropriate because it > is the direct consequence of their actions. > > When this means that the blogs are part and parcel of this wish, then we > should not try to circumvent this even when they write about us. > Thanks, > GerardM >
We should ignore them because they want to get paid for their work? Why? Frankly, I think the NY Times and other companies should require payment for much of their work as well. I'm willing to pay for their content, its worth it. Nathan _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
