2009/10/31 <wjhon...@aol.com>: > In a message dated 10/31/2009 12:24:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > thomas.dal...@gmail.com writes: > > >> As I said above, he wouldn't be working a month's notice if he had >> been fired. "Resigned by mutual agreement" is more likely. I guess >> either a) he didn't fit in in the office, b) the job turned out to be >> not quite what he was expecting or c) he had some kind of major change >> of plan. None of those options really makes for a good rumour.>> > > Let me suggest another scenario. > Dear employee, you're fired, however, please don't tell anyone that you've > been fired, go away and don't show up, and we'll keep paying you for another > month. If you open your mouth, we won't. > > So it's also an assumption that he's "working". At least in the office.
It's possible, but since that would require the WMF to intentionally mislead the community and there is no evidence to support it, I think it is unlikely to be the case. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
