2009/9/15 Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org>: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Hay (Husky) <hus...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> with its 255 pages >> this might be something that you would rather like to skim through >> instead of fully read :) > > Anything to disrupt my view that the NC licenses suck because it's unclear > what they mean?
Not a view I disagree with, personally! One interesting example the blog post brings up - a nonprofit-with-ads, paying for hosting costs that way, is that commercial? 60% of creators say it is non-commercial, whilst *70%* of reusers think so - which really does begin to sound like a recipe for unintentionally annoying a lot of people releasing material under the license. I wonder, perhaps, if the best thing the next generation of the -nc- licenses could include would be a long list of worked examples... -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
