On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Erik Zachte <erikzac...@infodisiac.com>wrote:
> There is another way to detect 100% reverts. It won't catch manual reverts > that are not 100 accurate but most vandal patrollers will use undo, and the > like. > > > > For every revision calculate md5 checksum of content. Then you can easily > look back say 100 revisions to see whether this checksum occurred earlier. > It is efficient and unambiguous. > > > > This will work for any Wikipedia for which a full archive dump is > available. > > > > > Erik Zachte > Luca's WikiTrust could easily reveal this info. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
