On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Ray Saintonge<sainto...@telus.net> wrote: > Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Tim Starling wrote: >> >>> Gregory Maxwell wrote: >>> >>>> I'm interested in knowing the nature of the error (understanding is >>>> the key to avoidance in the future!) >>>> >>> It was my fault, and it was pretty much identical to the error I made >>> in 2007, where certain kinds of edits were double-counted and so the >>> effective edit count threshold was lower than it should have been. >>> >> Thanks Tim. It sounded like what happened in the past. I apologize >> for not doing my part and catching it this time. :( >> >> To err is human... nice to know that at least some of us aren't bots. >> ;) May all future errors be as correctable! >> >> > It's also refreshing to see people who accept their share of > responsibility when something has gone. Kudos to both of you for such > rare kind of behaviour. > > > Ec > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >
Maybe we need to clone Tim too? :p -Chad _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
