On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:48 PM, stevertigo<stv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gerard Meijssen<gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What do you not understand ? > That is not for you to say. > >> It has been explained to you that the en approach is not compatible with >> what happens elsewhere. > What does this even mean? Nothing has been "explained." Terse and > useless "go away's" do not suffice as explanations. > >> This list is explicitly NOT about the en policies. > Dispute resolution is not particular to en.wiki. Others can benefit > from en.wiki's "policies" and likewise en.wiki can benefit from > understanding how others handle their issues. > >> You have been politely asked to go away.. > This is actually a contradiction of terms, though you state the > concept quite nicely. > >> Now what does it take for you to move on with this nonsense ? > Are you speaking in an official capacity? > > -Steven > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >
I'm speaking as a volunteer: go away, and take your thread with you. It is /not/ appropriate for foundation-l, period. It is obvious to everyone that this thread exists for solely one reason: for you to bitch and moan when you didn't get what you wanted on your timetable. This is also not appropriate for foundation-l, period. -Chad _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
