These are fabulous - thank you! I absolutely agree that smaller (but interesting) lists would attract more people if they saw what sorts of discussions happen there. [the technical dump-processing list is one example...]
Sj On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:00 PM, phoebe ayers <phoebe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > New list summaries for the past month: > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LSS/foundation-l-archives/2009_June_15-30 > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/LSS/foundation-l-archives/2009_July_1-15 > > I swear I'll try to get back on a bi-weekly schedule. Note: If anyone > wants to try their hand at summarizing some of the other lists, there > are lots of low-traffic project lists that could gain a bigger > audience if summarized. > > ------------------------------------------------ > Summary of the summary: > > * license changes rolled out across all projects end of June; > * discussions about what Commons and Wikisource should be, as projects; > * two strategic planning hires (and a new open job) announced; > * new grant for Commons, new WMF financial plan and 3 new chapters; > * Wikitech discussions: templates, video codecs and browsers; > * lots of discussion about the NPG and GLAMs issues -- a special > section in this month's summary; > > * miscellaneous: new sidebar donation buttons; grammar; Google > translate and image search; Wikipedians are grumpy; new Wikipedia > language; new PhD thesis on WP; WP & NIH workshop; Wikimania & flu; > how do you fully consult the community, anyway? > ------------------------------------------------------ > -- phoebe > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
