2009/7/11 private musings <thepmacco...@gmail.com>: > It's heartening to hear that the foundation has zapped images in the past - > presumably because they were potentially illegal? > > I'm also heartened by the fact that this isn't actually a huge problem at > the moment, so can be managed on a case by case basis - is there a good way > of letting someone appropriate know about an image which is rather close to > the line? (the follow on from this, of course, is to ask whether or not > there's any established policy or practice in this area, and whether or not > it 'works' enough of the time?) > > I'd be happier still if the image I linked to in my previous post was > permanently deleted, which by my judgment would be the best outcome. > > cheers, > > Peter, > PM.
The image is probably legal in the context of the commons deleted image database. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
