2009/7/6 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com>:
> 2009/7/3 Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com>:
>
>> {{qif}} was being used massively, even if the majority of the community
>> didn't know about it (or care). It supported their work and allowed them
>> to do the things with templates that they needed in articles. I would
>> argue these complex templates came from the community's needs.
>
>
> Your last sentence is key here. Templates that present a (relatively)
> simple interface but have complex plumbing to do cool things are
> much-wanted and much-needed.
>
> However, the ParserFunctions language sucks because it was made up as
> it goes along and resembles nothing so much as an [[esoteric
> programming language]]. A better language will make it easier to
> program templates that do complex things with a simple interface.
>Questionable. Since for fairly obvious reasons you can't let wikipedians execute arbitrary code through templates there is always going to be the problem of wikipedians useing workarounds that generate problematical code. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
