Hoi,
It is not obvious because a viral license assumes that all other content
will be contiminated with the same license. Hence when GFDL only is
incompatlible with our projects this material cannot be used in our
projects. This defeats the objective of Commons.
This should be obvious and hence it does follow that it is correct to
indicate that GFDL only material is not suitable.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/6/27 Nikola Smolenski <smole...@eunet.yu>
> Дана Friday 26 June 2009 18:02:57 Gerard Meijssen написа:
> > Given that the GFDL is a viral license, it is not obvious that we should
> > accept GFDL only material.
>
> Does not follow.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
