2009/6/18 Stephen Bain <stephen.b...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Erik Moeller<e...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> Because the GFDL is only of interest to a minority of >> re-users, > ... > > If this is the Foundation's view, why did it opt to push for (hobbled) > dual-licencing going forward, instead of transitioning completely to > CC-BY-SA and retaining GFDL only for legacy content?
As I understand it, it was a concession made to the FSF during the negotiations. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
