2009/6/16 Nikola Smolenski <smole...@eunet.yu>: > Please don't view this as trolling, because it is a honest question. The new > notice says that "you hereby agree that such credit is sufficient in any > medium".
No it says "Re-users will be required to credit you in any medium, at minimum, through a hyperlink or URL to the article you are contributing to" which is both actively misleading and not an actual release. It is also longer than your version. > Mere fact that this statement is there shows that, without > contributors' agreement, such credit would not be sufficient (or else you > wouldn't ask for it, given that you don't ask for agreement on a number of > other details). So, given that there are hundreds of millions of edits prior > to this notice where people haven't given their agreement that this credit is > sufficient, how is this actually going to work? It doesn't but Erik appears to hope that enough hand waving will make the issue go away. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l