2009/6/15 Brian <brian.min...@colorado.edu>: > The best you could possibly hope to do > is listen to their advice since this is unlikely to ever go to > court.
CC have a massive conflict of interest and public advice from Godwin is kinda thin on the ground. Obviously we don't know the situation with regards to private advice. >Additionally, if you wish to contribute to the projects you > must contribute according to the intention > and correct > interpretation of the license. No. The most obvious counter example is the disclaimers mess that the english wikipedia managed to get itself into a few years back. > A user's interpretation of the license > may or may not be in line with the correct > view. If it is not, they should not contribute. That's all I have. "Correct view" is not a good choice of terminology. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
