The Ombudsman Commission would likely be that group. Although their focus has traditionally been CheckUser, their purview actually covers any and all violations of the privacy policy. Here is one such case. At this moment, I agree: this sysop shouldn't be.
-Mike On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 06:21 -0500, Pedro Sanchez wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Tim 'avatar' Bartel < > wikipe...@computerkultur.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > recently the report of the KnowPrivacy [1] study - a research project > > by the School of Information from University of California in Berkeley > > - hit the German media [2]. > > > > The case of vlswiki is troubling as it's a single sysop who is stubbornly > adding the analytics bug > > - (huidig) > (latst<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&diff=131158&oldid=127221>) > 4 jun 2009 > 06:54<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&oldid=131158> > > Midom<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gebruker:Midom&action=edit&redlink=1> > > (discuusjeblad<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discuusje_gebruker:Midom&action=edit&redlink=1>| > bydroagn <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specioal:Bijdragen/Midom> | > blokkeer <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specioal:Blokkeren/Midom>) (74 > bytes) (privacy policy violation) (zre > ersteln<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&action=rollback&from=Midom&token=7b9e891163dcfaa7ffbc86f28f2734a5%2B%5C>| > > ersteln<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&action=edit&undoafter=127221&undo=131158>) > > - > (huidig<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&diff=131158&oldid=127221>) > > (latst<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&diff=127221&oldid=100968>) > 25 apr 2009 > 15:13<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&oldid=127221> > Tbc <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruker:Tbc> > (discuusjeblad<http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discuusje_gebruker:Tbc>| > bydroagn <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specioal:Bijdragen/Tbc> | > blokkeer <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specioal:Blokkeren/Tbc>) (363 > bytes) (cannot find in the policy this is not allowed) > (ersteln<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&action=edit&undoafter=100968&undo=127221>) > > - > (huidig<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&diff=131158&oldid=100968>) > > (latst<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&diff=100968&oldid=70975>) > 9 jul 2008 > 21:13<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&oldid=100968> > Drini <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruker:Drini> > (discuusjeblad<http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discuusje_gebruker:Drini>| > bydroagn <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specioal:Bijdragen/Drini> | > blokkeer <http://vls.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specioal:Blokkeren/Drini>) (74 > bytes) (google analytics is not allowed in global scripts) > (ersteln<http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&action=edit&undoafter=70975&undo=100968>) > > > http://vls.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&action=history > > What I propose is this being re-added would cause a removal of sysop bit due > to misuse of powers. > Don't we have a committee that checks privacy violations? > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
