My understanding is that SecurePoll can handle the type of vote we're dealing with, but I'll certainly double-check based on your comments. Thanks for the heads-up.
___________________ philippe philippe.w...@gmail.com Administrator, OTRS Volunteer [[en:User:Philippe]] On May 27, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Robert Rohde wrote: > Have you discussed software requirements with developers? > > I'm not sure the new SecurePoll software is yet set up to allow for > preferential voting (either on the input side or the tallying side). > > Also, we had a number of problems with tallying [1]. Some of which > was a result of essentially overloading the software with 17000 votes, > but even if you avoid that issue (for example by having stricter > suffrage requirements), there are still some things to look out for. > Which reminds me that I still need to go file some Bug reports... > > August is plenty of lead time to address these issues, but they > shouldn't be kept to the last minute. > > -Robert Rohde > > [1] http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/licom-l/2009-May/000245.html > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
