2009/3/30 Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com>: > Once again, if we have non-free.wikimedia.org repository, with precise > rules, we wouldn't be able to have all kinds of materials which policy > of Commons prohibits: > * Orphan works.
Strictly speaking no it doesn't. For example it would allow images that used the "the identity of an author shall be regarded as unknown if it is not possible for a person to ascertain his identity by reasonable inquiry; but if his identity is once known it shall not subsequently be regarded as unknown." clause under UK law. Good luck meeting that requirement though. > * Somewhat more flexible conditions for the situations like you mentioned. No. Commons lack of flexibility exists partly in order to keep things understandable. > * Logos and other trademarks at one place. > * Strictly defined fair use images (like on en.wp) at one place. This wouldn't be legal. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
