-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nathan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Cary Bass <c...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> I'd like to propose the following page: >> >> <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary/logo/refresh> be >> opened for arguments and vote on it start in a weeks time. >> >> I'd also like considerable help in advertising it throughout the >> projects and managing the page, as well. >> >> Cary >> > > Goes to the question of who determines the logo to be used, doesn't > it? If the meta vote approves the new logo, but a vote on en.wikt > does not, which is binding? Can meta participants vote to change > any logo? > > Nathan Of course Meta participants can vote; Wiktionary isn't solely "owned" by the people who most actively use it. It's a Wikimedia project, first and foremost. I generally expect most people who use Meta to respectfully give weight to the Wiktionarians, however, and not just "vote" on impulse. Most of us do that.
And to ensure that we have Wiktionarian participation, this is where "advertising" comes in. It should be promoted on the Village Pumps and mailing lists, as well as on IRC. I don't think there's much more we can do. If people don't pay attention to any of those, then I can't see how much interest they actually have in their community. (of course, one could also put it up in the Sitenotice). Cary -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJymFJyQg4JSymDYkRAsUhAKCMUeHVDmuArHKlBtVJGrKtHnqO0ACfSUqu 4TB55U5u0N1/Q9Zdh1+N/iw= =RkE4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
