That is not the kind of attribution that I have in mind, either. I think what we need are guidelines as to what links should or should not be saying, but we need to make it so that people can style it in a manner appropriate for the work they are using it in.
- Chris On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Brian <brian.min...@colorado.edu> wrote: > If there are no specifics instructions as to what a link is except > that it contains the correct url then I can argue that this is > sufficient attribution: > > <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Some Article" > rel="nofollow">source</a> > > This is not the kind of attribution I have in mind. > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Chris Down > <neuro.wikipe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Whilst I concur that we need to address more of the specifics, I would > > disagree that the proposal should incorporate rigidity about the link > text > > itself. There are various contexts which this will potentially accompany, > > and I cannot imagine that there is a one-size-fits-all link title. > > > > - Chris > > > > On > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
