Pharos wrote: > In contrast, Wikipedia's coverage of the humanities is often inferior > to the better print encyclopedias, and even with very basic subjects. > This is perhaps because the humanities lend themselves less to easy > summary, as there is usually a great variety of scholarly opinion on > basic subjects, unlike in science. > > The Tribe article is here typical: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe > Not that I necessarily disagree with your conclusions, but I wouldn't cite "Tribe" as a "typical" subject in the humanities, as it's more in the realm of the social sciences.
--Michael Snow _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
