They wrote the damned thing, so they are most likely to understand it.
________________________________ From: geni <geni...@gmail.com> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2009 7:41:32 PM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Attribution survey, first results 2009/3/4 Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org>: > 2009/3/3 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: >> Excellent. Getting some idea of community opinion is very important. >> However, has anyone carried out my suggestion of consulting with the >> CC lawyers? > > We've been in repeated conversations with CC about the possible > attribution models. CC counsel has commented specifically that > attribution-by-URL is a permissible attribution model that is > consistent with the language and intent of CC-BY*. > What is their line of reasoning on that? -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
