2009/3/2 P. Birken <pbir...@gmail.com>: > One of my reasons to develop Flagged Revs was an incident with blatant > vandalism in an article about a well known german politician that > persisted for several months until we got an email from his office. > That is plain unacceptable. Flagged revisions work very well in these > cases. However, flagged revisions are not the complete solution, in > particular they do not help persistently against clever POV pushing or > against making articles more unbiased. But: I really like the test > proposal on en-WP to try flagged revs out on BLP articles. Turn it on > for those as soon as possible.
As far as I can make out, the present situation on en:wp is: a proposal was put which got 59% support. That's not a sufficiently convincing support level. So Jimbo is currently putting together a better proposal, with the aim of at least 2/3 support and hoping for 80% - it'll be more robust. Timeframe, er, I just asked him as well. i.e. we're getting there! Inch by inch! - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
