On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sam Johnston <s...@samj.net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2009/2/3 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > >> Hoi, > >> The economics of it are such that there is a real fine balance between > cheap > >> and expensive. I positvely hate text on my posters. Printing on the back > is > >> two prints and that IS expensive. My point has been and still is that it > is > >> nice to come up with "solutions". They have to be practical in the real > >> world. If a proposed solution adds enough overhead, the effect will be > that > >> it will not be accepted a solution. > > > > Assuming posters are not for large scale public display sending the > > credits on a separate bit of paper would probably meets the > > requirements. > > I'm not aware of any print-on-demand providers who facilitate the > sending of arbitrary documentation with prints so my ability to reuse > is still unnecessarily restricted. > > Sam > Unfortunately I do not understand the interface of Wikiposters, but reading the translated English FAQ, I got the impression, that for instance if you order a poster of a GFDL image, they will print you the text of the GFDL as well. So I assumed Wikiposters is mindful of attribution requirements.
I guess, we would need someone, who has actually seen a Wikiposters poster, to tell us how they handle this -- and other licences -- in practice. Bence Damokos > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
