well if they/john bought the image rights then they would own it, meaning that the credit is sufficient as it is.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Chris Down <neuro.wikipe...@googlemail.com>wrote: > That page doesn't attribute the creator of the original image, either. > > - Chris > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Robert Rohde <raro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia-The_Missing_Manual_I_mediaobject_d1e29885.png > > > > -Robert Rohde > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Mark (Markie) > > <newsmar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > i must admit i havent looked closely, but could you give us an example > of > > an > > > image where the watermark can be clearly seen and is an issue? > > > > > > regards > > > > > > mark > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Chris Down > > > <neuro.wikipe...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > > > > >> Well, either way, there's no harm in asking him to upload ones without > > the > > >> watermark. > > >> > > >> - Chris > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gerard Meijssen > > >> <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hoi, > > >> > As far as I know, Commons has no such thing on watermarking. As > > always, > > >> > come > > >> > up with better illustrations and you can replace them. This is an > > >> > extraordinary situation anyway... Wikipedia has also this other > "rule; > > >> > Ignore all rules.. A good one to apply for now. > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > GerardM > > >> > > > >> > 2009/1/29 Chris Down <neuro.wikipe...@googlemail.com> > > >> > > > >> > > As a note, the images are watermarked, and I have notified the > user. > > >> IUP > > >> > > states that this should not occur. > > >> > > > > >> > > - Chris > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Thomas Dalton < > > >> thomas.dal...@gmail.com > > >> > > >wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > 2009/1/28 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > > > Wikipedia would have to write some kind of > > >> > > > > special exception to every rule to allow this book to exist > > there. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > We already have the only exception we need: IAR. (That doesn't > > means > > >> > > > Wikibooks wouldn't handle it better, though!) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > > foundation-l mailing list > > >> > > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > >> > > > Unsubscribe: > > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > >> > > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > foundation-l mailing list > > >> > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > >> > > Unsubscribe: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > >> > > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > foundation-l mailing list > > >> > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > >> > Unsubscribe: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> foundation-l mailing list > > >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > >> Unsubscribe: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > foundation-l mailing list > > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
