2009/1/22 Mike Godwin <mgod...@wikimedia.org>: > > Chad writes: > >> I'm not the one to decide, nor do I have particularly strong feelings >> about one method of attribution or another. Just thought I'd lay the >> blame for this mess where it belongs: a vaguely worded license >> with highly debatable terms. > > Without defending the particulars of CC's phrasing, which I think has > its problems but which I also think is better than you allow for here, > I'll offer my opinion that a license a license without any vagueness > or debatable terms is such a rarity that I don't think I've ever seen > one.
It it did exist, it would be several volumes long. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
