On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:23:51 Erik Moeller wrote: > 2009/1/20 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > > 1)This isn't legal within anything close to the current wording of the > > page. > > CC General Counsel has confirmed that our proposed attribution model > is consistent with the language of CC-BY-SA. There is no need to use > attribution parties - our proposed approach is consistent with 4(c)(i) > and 4(c)(iii).
Don't know about this wording thing, but as a Wikipedia author, I have to say that I do not think that attributing me in this way is sufficient. As a Wikimedian, I believe that a lot of people will feel the same. And as a programmer, I do not see why is this controversy necessary at all, as a number of people have presented a variety of solutions that make it possible to analyse the revisions and extract authors with satisfying accuracy. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
