David Gerard wrote:
> 2008/12/22 Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>
>>> The following Firefox bookmarklet may be useful:
>>> javascript:(function(){Darwin.Upsell.deactivate();})()
>>>
>
>
>> Thanks! It works well :)
>>
>
>
> They called the function "upsell"? *facepalm* Wikipedia doesn't need
> to do anything to compete with Britannica, just leave them to collapse
> under the weight of their own ineptitude.
>
> We should probably run a large public "Save Britannica!" campaign -
> how to save a great historical encyclopedia, second only to the OED as
> one of the great works of Anglophone non-fiction, from its own
> business stupidity. I'm halfway serious. What could we do with a "Save
> Britannica" campaign?
>
> (There are many ways in which it sucks, but it still manages
> *consistent* quality better than en:wp. Better writing, too. A lot of
> us wouldn't be doing this Wikipedia thing if we weren't encyclopedia
> fans in the first place, and that includes Britannica.)
>
>
> - d.
>
> ________________
I don't think you can be more clear than:
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/bparchive?year=2006&post=2006-03-24,3
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
