Hi all, Yes, I know that in large organizations it is uncommon to approve minutes by email. I however see no fundamental obstacles myself, but I'd love to hear from them if they are there. Please note that "commonness" is no argument to me in this case. I understand how we got to the current situation, but that is not what I want to discuss. I'd like to discuss a change in that situation :)
It is about minutes, not about opinions. The only thing that should be judged while publishing is 1) whether they reflect the truth and 2) whether there is anything in there that should remain non-disclosed. Both can in principle perfectly be considered by email imho. A summary is something, but personally I prefer the real resolutions and minutes :) In general they are not too extensive anyway in this organization. And, as Thomas pointed out, this *is* an unusual organization. Not only are there many volunteers, but there are also a lot of chapters who are dependent in some way of these resolutions. These can influence their functioning quite a lot, and only recieve the minutes together with the general public. But of course, again, if there are heavy arguments not to do this, I'd love to hear of them :) Thank you Ting, for taking it to the board. I hope that in the future, the community and chapters can more actively participate in the movement :) Best regards, Lodewijk 2008/12/14 Ting Chen <wing.phil...@gmx.de> > The chair of the board, Michael, had posted the topics before the > meeting and a short report about resolutions and issues discussed after > the meeting. > > Ting > > Anthony wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:49 AM, effe iets anders > > <effeietsand...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > >> From Sue's report, I understood that the current practice is to have > board > >> minutes approved only on the next board meeting. In practice that means > a > >> delay of several months. In a quickly changing world as ours, that is > quite > >> a long time span. > >> > >> > > > > That's a fairly standard practice. How would you approve the minutes > > without holding a meeting? (Sure, you could do it using a unanimous > consent > > resolution, but that's certainly not typical.) > > > > Would it be possible to decrease this time span somehow, and approve the > > > >> minutes on an earlier moment? In that way, the volunteers can be kept > more > >> up to date, the board would work more transparently and better ways to > >> interact and react on decisions made. Because if minutes are published > >> months afterwards, the motivation to read them and react on it is > obviously > >> much lower then when they actually still have a direct meaning and are > more > >> or less recent. Besides that, if the community has imput on the > decisions > >> made, they could give it, and it could be discussed in that next board > >> meeting, and not only the one after that (delay 6 months). > >> > >> I sincerely hope the board will find a way to publish the minutes > within, > >> say, two weeks to a month :) > >> > > > > > > Publishing a draft of the minutes (or an informal summary of the meeting) > > would be one thing. Approving the official minutes is quite another. > > > > Are the meetings considered confidential? If not, there's nothing > stopping > > any board member from providing a summary at any time. If so, well, then > > why publish the minutes in the first place? > > _______________________________________________ > > foundation-l mailing list > > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
