@Pedro :Yep, it's a two way interaction that I believe benefits all projects (sort of human interwiki)
@Thomas:Echo would be the English word, thanks. "Ecco" however is also correct eEnglish, ref. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Guerilla_non-eEnglish_spelling_and_grammar_campaign. (Note to self: Irony should be avvoided in online communication, especially when writing foreignly) @Gerard: Yes, there will be a lot of loud voices, but in the end we'll manage to work out this as an improvement to help new (and perhaps older) users as well. There was A LOT of load voices at Commons when (what I still hope is) a more userfriendly uploadsystem was launched, but it seems to be working just fine ;) We may get more nonsense articles going straight to speedy deletion, but the way to raise the quality of wikip/media is certainly not to avvoid maiking it easier for people to edit, Finn R 2008/12/1 Pedro Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Finn Rindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I'd like to ecco (is that an eEnglish word..?) Michael Finney here. Most > > people who engage them self in a small language wikimedia projects will > > sooner or later participate in projects like en:wp and commons as well - > and > > thus both learn more about the "facts of reality" as well as > communicating > > with others in a (for them) foreign language. > > An also a fair share of people who initially engage into enwip ant he > alike, eventually decide to migrate to smaller projects. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
